The Proceedings of the Symposium held in Munich 12-14 October 2007 Tagungsbericht des Münchner Symposiums 12. 14. Oktober 2007
The Proceedings of the Symposium held in Munich
12-14 October 2007
Tagungsbericht des Münchner Symposiums
12.-14. Oktober 2007
S. KROLL, C. GRUBER, U. HELLWAG, M. ROAF & P. ZIMANSKY
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii-viii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The prehistory of an Urartian landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The economy of Urartu: probabilities and problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Urartäische und achämenidische Wasserbauten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Urartian fortifications in Iran: an attempt at a hierarchical classification
. . . . . . .
TONESocial differentiation within Urartian settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Urartu as empire: cultural integration in the kingdom of Van . . . . . . . . . . 101-110
ALVINIDas Corpus der urartäischen Inschriften . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111-134
UCHSUrar †u in der Zeit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135-161
ROLLSalmanassar III. und das frühe Urartu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163-168
From the state of Urartu to the formation of the Armenian kingdom . . . . . . . . 169-176
EIDLRusa son of Erimena, Rusa son of Argi sti and Rusahinili/Toprakkale . . . . . . . . 177-181
ROLLRusa Erimena in archäologischem Kontext . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183-186
OAFCould Rusa son of Erimena have been king of Urartu during Sargon’s Eighth Campaign? . 187-216
Urartu in der Bibel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217-225
Der Niedergang Urartus
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227-241
Between a rock and a hard place: Mu ÒaÒir, Kumme, Ukku and Subria – the buffer states between Assyria and Urar †u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243-264
USCARELLAHasanlu and Urartu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265-279
Urartu und die Nomaden: Zur Adaption altorientalischer Motive im reiternomadischenKunsthandwerk des 7.-5. Jh. v. Chr. in Eurasien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281-293
ILINGIROGLUUrartian temples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295-307
TRONACHUrartu’s impact on Achaemenid and pre-Achaemenid architecture in Iran . . . . . . 309-320
UNNWandmalerei in Urartu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321-337
ERRMANNSome Assyrianizing ivories found at Nimrud: could they be Urartian? . . . . . . . . 339-350
OAFTowers with plants or spears on altars: some thoughts on an Urartian motif . . . . . . 351-372
The pottery traditions in Armenia from the eighth to the seventh centuries BC . . . . . 373-378
ILLERBewaffnung und Tracht urartäischer und nordwestiranischer Krieger des 9. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.: Ein Beitrag zur historischen Geographie des frühen Urartu . . . . . . . . 379-390
UBINSONUrartian (?) belts and some antecedents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391-396
Bogen und Pfeil: Ihr Einsatz im frühen 1. Jt. v. Chr. in Urartu und seinem Nachbarland Assyrien . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397-410
ARTKEBemerkungen zur Metallurgie Urartus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411-416
Frühes Messing? Zur Verwendung von Zink in urartäischen Kupferlegierungen . . . . . 417-426
URTISAssyrian and Urartian metalwork: independence or interdependence? . . . . . . . . 427-443
Afterword: The future of Urartu’s past . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445-450 Bibliography
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451-502Index of persons, gods, peoples, and places . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503-518 Colour plates
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519-528
See Zimansky 1990: 19, Lanfranchi 1995: 127 and Salvini 1995b: 43 for a brief overview of the debate. Lanfranchi 1995 proposed –
convincingly, in my mind – to place Hubu
skia in ‘the upper valley of the Lower Zab, that long and narrow strip of land which extends north-
south from its springs, around Khaneh, to Sardasht’ (p. 136) yet Salvini 1997 remained undecided while the latest treatment by Medvedskaya
1997 again championed Hubu
skia’s location in the area of Hakkari, despite the resulting serious difficulties for reconstructing Urartian his-
tory highlighted by Reade (1994: 185-187). The discovery of 13 stone steles at Hakkari in 1998 has stimulated an interest in the historical
geography of the area, but it is not helpful to automatically assume a connection with Hubu
skia, as Sevin & Özfirat (2001c: 19-20) seem to
2 Fuchs 2000 distilled five Habhu countries out of the multitude of attestations; I am still tempted to see the term simply as a generic wordfor mountain region (cf. Radner & Schachner 2001: 761-762).
Parker 2001, 2002.4
Mayer 2002. Note that the section dealing with the second millennium situation suffers from the fact that Kumme is merged with
anu which cannot be maintained for geographical reasons.17
BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE:
∑A∑IR, KUMME, UKKU AND SUBRIA – THE BUFFERSTATES BETWEEN ASSYRIA AND URAR
ADNERThe relationship between Assyria and Biainili was an uneasy one ever since the initial contacts in the 9th
century BC, and the two states frequently clashed over conflicts of interest. While this resulted in the two
rivals’ successive annexation of territories in south-eastern Turkey and north-western Iran, the mountainous
regions between the headwaters of the Tigris and of the Lower Zab remained independent and a group of small
kingdoms was allowed to survive: Countries like
Subria, Kumme, Ukku and Musasir separated Assyria from
Urartu and formed a string of ‘buffer states’ between the two powers (Fig. 17.01). These kingdoms are cer-
tainly not the only independent regions inside the Assyro-Urartian corridor: Hubu
skia (whose location is still
and the various Habhu countries2
may be mentioned but I shy away from treating them
here precisely because of the problems to put them on the map and will instead focus on four of the better
documented states. In order to appreciate more fully the respective roles of
Subria, Kumme, Ukku and Musasir,
I will not limit myself to the situation during the 9th to 7th century but will try to trace the history of these
territories leading up to the period when we see them caught up in the Assyro-Urartian conflict.
Although certainly not among the most prominent of Near Eastern states,
Subria, Kumme, Ukku and
Musasir have found their share of attention in the recent past. Musasir is of course discussed in any context
that concerns Urartian royal ideology and / or the ‘homeland’ of the royal dynasty of I
spuini. The relationship
of Assyria with some of these states, specifically
Subria, Kumme and Ukku, has more than once been studied
within the theoretical framework of frontier studies by Bradley J. Parker
, the regional focus due to his workbeing based on the analysis of the results of Guillermo Algaze’s surveys in the Turkish Tigris region between
1988 and 1992. Walter Mayer’s study of Kumme
, on the other hand, was written in the context of an inter-disciplinary research project on transregional sanctuaries yet he focuses ultimately (like Parker whose work he
does not seem to be aware of) on the impact of the close relationship with Assyria.
In this paper, I will attempt to study these small kingdoms ‘from within’, consciously avoiding the Assyr-
ian or Urartian perspective. This is from the start a somewhat flawed endeavour; the most serious obstacle is
the lack of autochthonous sources which can only to a degree be overcome by using the materials left by the
scribes of their two powerful neighbours: The official accounts preserved in the Assyrian and Urartian royal
inscriptions are supplemented by the wealth of information found in the correspondence of Sargon of Assyria
(721-705 BC) with his top officials and other materials from the Assyrian state archives of Kalhu and Nineveh.
SAA 5 95 (= Lanfranchi & Parpola 1990: no. 95).
None of the political and religious centres which we shall encounter in our survey has been excavated (with
the possible exception of Ukku), but the conspicuous lack of written materials – monumental and archival –
may be more than just the result of archaeological fortunes:
Subria, Kumme and Musasir can certainly be
described as (linguistically and culturally) Hurrian states, and, as in Mittani before them, royal display of
power may have taken other forms than the monumental inscriptions known from Assyrians, Urartians or
Hittites. The bureaucrats, whom we expect to find in the shadow of a major temple such as the temples of the
storm god of Kumme and of Haldi of Musasir, may have used other ways to keep their books than writing on
It is, however, impossible to imagine a scenario in which these states functioned entirely without writing:
For the reign of Sargon II, the preserved letters show that Assyrian cuneiform scribes were put at the local
rulers’ disposal (or rather were forced onto them) and facilitated the required correspondence with Assyria. On
the other hand, information found in these letters also attests to the fact that the Urartian king likewise expected
to receive messages from these rulers
; yet in what shape is unclear: a letter from the king ofSubria to an
Assyrian magnate evidently composed in Hurrian, as is clear from the Hurrian extract quoted (with a transla-
tion) in the summary report to Sargon (SAA 5 35), should alert us to the fact that the Assyrian language was
not the only language used for the exchange of messages, even when communicating with Assyrian officials.
Fig. 17.01. Map showing the location of the buffer states between Assyria and Urartu
(drawing by C. Wolff and labelling by C. Gruber after a sketch by K. Radner).
Kessler 1986: 66; Wilhelm 1986: 106.7
To borrow the title of Steiner 1994, a stimulating analysis of the two opposing views of writing in evidence in the Greek sources of the
fifth and fourth centuries BC: as the guarantor of the citizens’ rights on the one hand, as the instrument of coercive regulation on the other.
See Braidwood 1972: 312 for a history of the now universally used term.9
Diakonoff & Kashkai 1981: 9 s.v. Ardine.
Salvini 1993-1997: 445.11
A-rí-nu-um.KI in Bryn Mawr College no. 2 l. 17, a list of small cattle from various settlements in the Transtigridan area dated to
49th regnal year, published by Ellis 1979: 35-36; cf. Astour 1987: 22 who, however, does not connect the city with the later Musasir.
See below for discussion of an inscription of Tiglath-pileser I that demonstrates that Arinum/Arini corresponds to Ardini/*Arteni.
Diakonoff & Kashkai 1981: 58 s.v. MuÒaÒir.
Grayson 1991: 293 A.0.101.30 l. 147: KUR.Mu-Òa-Òi-ra-a-a.
The reading follows Fales 2003: 136-138 but note that he suggests to interpret bs/z‘tr as a personal name.15
Grayson 1991: 23 A.0.87.1 v 67-81.
With Postgate 1995: 7 and against e.g. Mayer 2002: 329.17
Diakonoff & Kashkai 1981: 70 s.v. Qumenu.
Postgate 1995: 6-7.But although we should bear in mind that such correspondence could spawn unlikely results – the characteris-
tic genre of Urartian inscriptions, for example, must be considered a development from the conventions of
Assyrian letter writing
– we should not necessarily expect local adaptations of the ‘tyrant’s writ’7
life is entirely possible without the tyranny of writing and the freedom not to write may have been a highly
valued cultural choice that set the rulers and inhabitants of the mountain kingdoms apart from their Assyrian
and Urartian neighbours.
The territories under investigation are not remote backwaters, forgotten by civilization. Situated as they
are in Breasted and Braidwood’s ‘hilly flanks of the Fertile Crescent’
, they boast continuous human occupa-tion for far longer than the Mesopotamian plain, and an awareness of the antiquity of their traditions may be
reflected by the great respect in which their deities and their sanctuaries were held in the entire Near East;
I will argue in this paper that it was this respect that protected Musasir, Kumme and
Subria from their aggres-
sive first millennium neighbours in Assyria and Urartu. We will begin our survey with the perhaps most
famous independent state in the Assyro-Urartian corridor, the country which the Assyrians called Musasir.
ÒaÒir (Assyrian) / Ardini (Urartian) – The Holy City of Haldi
The Urartian sources of the first millennium BC use the traditional name Ardini
, derived from Hurrian*arte-ni ‘The City’
, a designation already in evidence before 2000 BC during the reign ofSulgi of Ur.
Butthe very same ancient settlement, as the Urartian bilingual inscriptions show
, was known to the Assyriansfrom at least the 9th century BC onwards as ‘Mu
ÒaÒir’: the earliest reference is found in the so-called Banquet
Stele of Assurnasirpal II (883-859 BC) where delegates from Musasir are listed among the foreign dignitaries
attending the inauguration festivities at the new royal residence city Kalhu.
Perhaps the city was knownunder yet another name in Mannea and / or in the Aramaic language, for in the stele from Qalaychi (‘Buk
stele’) south of Lake Urmia, Musasir’s deity Haldi is invokes as hldy zy bs/z‘tr ‘Haldi of BS/Z‘TR’.
The Assyrian name ‘MuÒaÒir’ must be derived from the region’s designation as ‘MuÒru’ in the late second
millennium which we encounter most clearly in the inscriptions of Tiglath-pileser I (1114-1076 BC)
: The god Assur, my lord, commanded me to conquer KUR.Mu-uÒ-ri and I took the way between Mounts KUR.E- la-mu-ni, KUR.Ta-la and KUR.Ha-ru-sa. I conquered KUR.Mu-u Ò-ri in its entirety and slew their warriors. I
burned, razed and destroyed their settlements. The troops of KUR.Qu-ma-né-e came to the aid of KUR.Mu-uÒ-ri. I
fought with them in the mountains (and) I brought about their defeat. I confined them to just one city, URU.A-ri-ni
which is at the foot of Mount KUR.A-i-sa. They submitted to me (and) I spared that city. I imposed upon them
hostages, tax duties and tribute.
The neighbouring kingdom of Qum
ane, which must be distinguished
from the similar sounding city ofKumme (Urartian Qumenu
), can be located with confidence in the plain of Alqos,
and the city of URU.A-ri-ni sa GÌR KUR.A-i-sa can certainly be identified with the Urartian Ardini and the Neo-Assyrian Musasir,
The name is preserved in Assyrian texts in a variety of different spellings, in the inscriptions of Sargon II as KUR.Ú-a-(ú)-us and in
Sargon’s letters as URU / KUR.U / Ú-a-(a)-si and URU.Ú-e-si (for references see Lanfranchi & Parpola 1990: 248); for the Urartian refer-
ences see Diakonoff & Kashkai 1981: 103 s.v. W
Zimansky 1985: 128 n. 148; Zimansky 1990: 16-17 with n. 60.
Sg 8: 322 (see n. 37).22
Although the passage in all probability refers to the Rowanduz Çay, a tributary of the Greater Zab, as suggested by Russell 1984: 198;
cf. Zimansky 1990: 20.
Sg 8: 323 (see n. 37). The identical names were also noted by Astour 1987: 21 and Mayer 2002: 344.24
Grayson 1987: 183 A.0.77.1 ll. 47-55.
This popular but incorrect assumption is often made, most recently by Deszö 2006: 38 n. 28.26
Grayson 1987: 183 A.0.77.1 ll. 22-46.
For references see Saporetti 1970 and Freydank & Saporetti 1979.28
Grayson 1987: 132 A.0.76.1 l. 31 mu-sek-nis KUR.Mu-uÒ-ri ‘subduer of MuÒru’ as an epithet of Shalmaneser.
Grayson 1987: 273 A.0.78.23 l. 78 URU.A-ri-in-ni.30
See also Nashef 1982: 37 s.v. Arinnu.
AHw 659 s.v. miÒru(m); CAD M/II 113-115 s.v. miÒru A.
Thureau-Dangin 1912: XII; Collon 1994. The seal is unfortunately of unknown provenance: it was acquired by the Austrian ambassadorGraf von Schwachheim at the end of the 18th century AD in Istanbul and is now part of the collection of the Koninklijk Penningkabinet at
which is known from the later sources to be situated in the vicinity of Mount Uajais
and to border onto thesynonymous Urartian province and its principal city.
Moreover, Mount KUR.Ha-ru-sa can certainly beequated with KUR.Ar-si-ú, the ‘mighty mountain’ which Sargon II’s crack army crosses to get to Musasir in
And finally, Mount KUR.E-la-mu-ni can be connected with the fact that, according to Sargon’s informa-
tion, the Greater Zab
was known as ÍD.E-la-mu-ni-a in this area23
. The combination of the regional name
Òru, the city name Arinu (< *arte-ni, with Assyrianized ending) and the mountain names (U)aisa = Uajais,Harusa = Arsiu and Elamuni makes it certain that we can take this passage to be a reliable reference to the
later city of Musasir.
Therefore, the earlier report on a campaign of Shalmaneser I of Assyria (13th century BC) against Mu
and the holy city of Arinu also referred to the future kingdom of Musasir
and the holy city of Ardini (and
not to the Hittite city of Arinna
): The city of URU.A-ri-na, the holy city founded in bedrock, which had previously rebelled (and) disregarded thegod A
ssur – with the support of Assur and the great gods, my lords, I captured (and) destroyed that city and sowed
salt over it. I gathered its earth and piled it up at the gate of my city Assur for posterity. At that time, I had all of
KUR.Mu-uÒ-ri submit to my lord Assur.
Already in this early account, ‘Mu
Òru’ is clearly differentiated from ‘Urua†ri’, subject of a separate cam-
The description as ‘holy city founded in bedrock’ again stresses the mountainous location butalso hints at the existence of an unidentified sanctuary within the city limits. This is certainly the temple of
Haldi, and while neither he nor his temple are explicitly mentioned in the Middle Assyrian sources, the theo-
nym is well attested as a formative element in Assyrian personal names such as Kidin-Haldi and
– evidence for the widespread influence of the master of the holy city. We must take notice of Shalmaneser’sclaim to have razed the rebellious city – which had been subdued a century earlier by A
ssur-uballit I (14th
century) if we can trust an inscription of Shalmaneser’s predecessor Adad-nerari I
– with the specific mentionof its debris being transported back to Assur for a ritual of victory and commemoration; yet we know that
Arinu survived the destruction, as it is mentioned in an inscription of Shalmaneser’s successor Tukulti-Ninurta
29 and a century and a half later by Tiglath-pileser I.Let us have another look at the toponyms that we have encountered so far in connection with Haldi’s city.
On the one hand, we can trace the Hurrian *arte-ni ‘The city’ in the shape of Middle Assyrian Arrinu
Urartian Ardini while on the other hand, Middle Assyrian ‘Mu
Òru’ is transformed into Neo-Assyrian ‘MuÒaÒir’.
It is probable that ‘Mu
Òru’ originally meant nothing more than ‘borderland’
which, from an Assyrian per-spective, suits its fringe location at the edge of the Zagros mountain range rather well. How this morphed into
ÒaÒir’ cannot be reconstructed, yet an explanation of sorts for this name is given in one of the two inscrip-
tions engraved on the Assyrian cylinder seal (Fig. 17.02)
which belonged to Urzana, Musasir’s ruler during93688_Krol_Acta-Iranica_17.indd 246
dLAMMA = aban lamassi, literally ‘stone of the protective deity.’ The seal is fashioned out of pink chalcedony and NA
might also refer to the material, but this is less likely; see Collon 1994: 37.
sa GIM MUS
ina KUR-e HUL.MES
The reading is unproblematic with the exception of the last two signs in l. 3. I follow the small emendation of Thureau-Dangin 1912: XII
rather than the proposal of Irving Finkel apud Collon 1994: 37-38 to read this line as URU.Ú-ra
! -as-ti and interpret this as ‘an Urartian city’,
this spelling for Urartu is not attested in the contemporary Assyrian texts but perhaps more importantly, Musasir was not an Urartian city.
C.B.F. Walker apud Collon 1987: 87.36
For the many attempts to reconstruct the route of this campaign see Zimansky 1990 (with a map sketching the previous reconstructions
of the route on p. 6 fig. 1) and Zimansky 1995b and cf. Salvini 1995b: 46.
Text publication by Thureau-Dangin 1912 with an additional fragment published in KAH 2 141; last full edition by Mayer 1983.The text is here quoted as Sg 8.
the reign of Sargon II (721-705 BC): this beautiful example of Assyrian craftsmanship is decorated with the
image of a four-winged, bare-headed genius throttling two ostrich birds and may have been an official Assyr-
ian gift to Urzana when relations between Assyria and Musasir were still blossoming. While the first and
original inscription only identifies the purpose of the seal as a talisman,
the secondary inscription, which wasengraved in six lines above and below the first one, seems to provide us with an etymology for the name
Seal of Urzana, the king of Musasir, the city of the raven, of which, like a snake in difficult mountains, the mouth
Fig. 17.02. Seal of Urzana (after Wartke 1993a: Abb. 16 ).
Leaving the reference to Musasir as a ‘raven city’ aside for the moment, we can certainly agree with
C.B.F. Walker that the second part of the inscription is a pun on the Assyrian name of the city, consisting ofm uÒu ‘exit’ and Òiru ‘snake’
and would therefore appear somewhat less obscure in an Assyrian-speakingenvironment than our translation might initially suggest.
Therefore, we should perhaps not expect to find clues in the physical landscape that may be connected
with a snake’s mouth, yet on the other hand there can be little doubt that the city was indeed situated in ‘dif-
ficult mountains’ – but where exactly? It seems evident from the itinerary of Sargon’s 714 campaign,
in his Letter to A
that Musasir should be situated somewhere in the impressive mountain range which
needed to be crossed in order to reach Lake Urmia when coming from central Assyria. The assumption of a
See Russell 1984: 175-176 and André-Salvini & Salvini 2002: 29-30.
Edition Benedict 1961 (= CTU A 3-11); with Salvini 1984: 63-64 and Mayer 1988.40
Edition Salvini 1984: 79-95 (including the duplicate from Mergeh Karvan) (= CTU A 10-5); a German translation is also given in
Salvini 1984: 83. Note the warning of Salvini (2001d: 256-257) against the edition by N.V. Arutjunjan 2001: no. 387. According to Lan-
franchi & Parpola 1990: XVII-XVIII, Rusa’s steles can be dated with the help of letters from the Sargon correspondence to the events after
714 BC, but André-Salvini & Salvini 2002: 28-29 advocate a different reconstruction of events and assume that the steles were set up before
Sargon’s conquest of Musasir in 714.
For a map of the area see Boehmer 1993-1997: 447 Abb. 1.42
The term ‘duplicate’ should be used with considerable caution: although the Assyrian text inscribed on all three steles seems to be
identical apart from the mention of different toponyms in passages which may refer to the erection of the monuments, the divergences in the
Urartian versions are considerable; yet the fragmentary nature of all three steles makes a detailed comparison difficult (see André-Salvini &
Salvini 2002: 26-28).
CTU A 10-4. For the location and the circumstances of the find see Salvini 1984: 54 (map), 80-81 with n. 9; also André-Salvini &Salvini 2002: 32 (map).
Edition André-Salvini & Salvini 2002 (= CTU A 10-4).45
SAA 5 136. The significance of the letter was recognized by Deller 1984: 121.
The photographs chosen by Braidwood & Howe 1960: pl. 1-3 to illustrate the gradual change in the landscape between the piedmontcountry of Erbil and the highland country near Rowanduz give a good idea of the different terrain covered by this itinerary.
A suggestion by Zadok 1978: 181 that has found general acceptance, see e.g. Deller 1984: 121, Lanfranchi 1995: 130, Postgate 1995:8.
Salvini 1994: 207.49
Sg 8: 425: i-na né-re-bisa KUR.An-da-ru-ut-ta KUR-i mar-Òi SAG URU.Hi-ip-tú-na at-tu-Òi-a sal-mís a-n KUR-ia a-tu-ra ‘I emerged
from the pass of Andaruttu, a difficult mountain, above Hiptunu and returned safely to my country.’
The Shanidar Cave is most famous for its Neanderthal skeletons (Trinkaus 1983) and the Proto-Neolithic cemetery, now dated to the9th millennium BC (Solecki et al. 2004) but note that an early survey yielded some Neo-Assyrian pottery sherds (Mahmud al-Amin apud
Solecki 1971: 47).
location to the west of Lake Urmia is further strengthened by the find spots in the Iraqi province of Erbil
of two steles erected by Urartian kings, one by I
spuini and Minua and the other by Rusa son of Sarduri
(Fig. 17.01). The monuments’ bilingual inscriptions – in Urartian and Assyrian and therefore quite clearly
addressed not only to their own people but also to the Assyrians (or perhaps those factions in Musasir who
could read Assyrian) – recount journeys of I
spuini, Minua and Rusa to Musasir and seem to mark the route
It is plausible to assume that the city should be located in their vicinity. I
spuini and Minua’s stele
,now in the Museum in Urumiyeh (Iran), once stood at the pass of Kelishin (36° 54
b N, 44° 55b E) at the
modern-day border between Iraq and Iran, while the monument of Sargon’s contemporary, Rusa son of
now in the Museum of Erbil (Iraq), was erected at Topzawa (36° 48
b N, 44° 41b E) just to the north-
east of the modern town of Sidikan, some 25 km south-west of the Kelishin pass and reached from there by
descending alongside the course of the Topzawa Çay.
Two duplicates of or, perhaps better, close parallels42
to Rusa’s bilingual stele were found in the Iranian province of Western Azerbaijan: a very fragmentary piecein 1976 at Mergeh Karvan
just at the eastern side of the Kelishin pass, and the by far most complete (althoughpoorly preserved) copy in 1995 much further to the north at Movana
(37° 36b N, 44° 49b E), apparently along-
side the route leading from Kelishin back to Urartu’s capital Tu
spa (Turuspa in Assyrian) (modern Van
Another important clue to the location of Musasir is offered in a letter from Sargon’s correspondence
recording the daily stages of the itinerary from Musasir to Arbail
: URU.A-la-mu, URU.Hi-ip-tú-ni, URU.Mu- si, [U]RU.1-te and finally Arbail, the stations scheduled for Urzana king of Musasir on his way to meet
with the Assyrian king. Of these places, only Hiptunu can be located: its identification with Tall Haft
b N, 44° 15b E)47
in the Herir plain is virtually certain. Hiptunu was separated from Musasir by the Andaruttu
mountains, considered divine as their mention as the god Adaruta in the Urartian Meher Kapısı inscription (see
Mount Andaruttu can easily be equated with the Baradost mountain range and the passexplicitly mentioned in Sargon’s Letter to A
should be identified with the pass between the Seko massif
and the Baradost massif which connects the valley of Mergazur with that of the Greater Zab: in the mid 20th
century AD, this route was routinely used by the Shirwani tribal Kurds to move, together with their livestock,
between their winter accommodation in the Shanidar cave
and other nearby caves and their summer-time93688_Krol_Acta-Iranica_17.indd 248
Solecki 1979: 319-321. The map of the area given on p. 319 (and reproduced here) corresponds to the one in Solecki et al. 2004: 121fig. 1.
Solecki 1971: 108.53
Solecki 1971: 103-104, 108-111, with interesting observations about the construction of the bridge in 1952 and about the tolls charged
to each family for the passage of their livestock (but not the people): two Iraqi fils for each sheep or goat and twenty fils for each horse or
Sg 8: 349.
Salvini 1984; André-Salvini & Salvini 2002 (= CTU A 10-3 obv. 46', A 10-4 obv. 19', A 10-5 obv. 16').
habitation in the Mergazur valley which, being shielded from the sun, is a much cooler environment than the
other side of the mountain range (Fig. 17.03);
the same pass was also used by the Herki tribal Kurds and theirlivestock on their way to Iran, via Mergazur and Kelishin,
crossing the Greater Zab with the help of a woodenbridge that they assembled at Pira Sar gorge at Shanidar for the occasion
. The Baradost pass through themountains is well suited to move the rich spoils taken by Sargon from Musasir to Assyria, including ‘6110
people [plus Urzana’s family], twelve mules, 380 donkeys, 525 cattle and 1235 sheep’.
It was into the sameAndaruttu mountains that Rusa pursued Urzana when he was trying to flee from Musasir to Assyria.
Fig. 17.03. The passage through the Baradost mountain range (reproduced from Solecki 1979: 319).
The British officer Major Kenneth Mason (1919: 334-335; the useful area map on p. 337 is reproduced here), dispatched from Mosul
to Rowanduz in January 1919, gives a good account on the difficulty of travelling along that route, especially in regard to the crossing of the
Rowanduz river. The perils of this route are also clear from the account of the engineer A.M. Hamilton (1937) who was responsible for the
construction of the road from Erbil to Rowanduz between 1928 and 1932.
Boehmer 1973; Boehmer & Fenner 1973b; Boehmer 1993-1997: 446-448.58
For a critique see Zimansky 1990: 3 n. 11 who remains unconvinced of the identification; others, e.g. Russell 1984: 177 and Postgate
1995: 9, are more positive.
The area is also accessible via Rowanduz – the controlling point on the route leading from Erbil to Lake
Urmia via the Gawre Shinke Pass (also Garaushinke Pass; see Fig. 17.04) – but this requires the repeated
crossing of the Rowanduz river, which a trek with livestock would better aim to avoid.
Fig. 17.04. The route from Erbil to Iran prior to the construction of Hamilton’s Rowanduz Road(reproduced from Mason 1919: 337).
To sum up, Musasir is separated from Assyria by Mount Andaruttu (the Baradost mountain range) and
from Urartu by Mount Uajais (the Zagros main ridge with peaks like Mount Halgurt reaching over 3600 m).
The Assyrian and Urartian texts would therefore indicate Musasir’s general location in the area of Sidikan
(Fig. 17.05); Rainer M. Boehmer,
prompted by the apparent similarity of the two toponyms, suggested thatMusasir should be identified with the fortified Iron Age site of Mudjesir, some 7 km west of Topzawa, but
while this remains possible it must be pointed out that the identification has never been proven conclusively.
Yet although the city itself may not be located precisely at present, few would argue with the assumption that93688_Krol_Acta-Iranica_17.indd 250
Grayson 1996: 70 A.0.102.14 ll. 178-179; 83 A.0.102.16 ll. 325’-326’. The description of life in the village of Rust with a population
of 700, recorded in the mid 20th century AD before it was connected to the Rowanduz road (Galloway 1958), gives an idea of the climatic
conditions and the economic conditions in the Sidikan area.
Zimansky 1990: 3 with n. 11, 20.61
Sg 8: 310: LÚ.sad-da-a-’u-ú.
the kingdom of Musasir – for which the fortified city of URU.Zap-pa-ri-a and 46 other settlements are reported
in the inscriptions of Shalmaneser III (858-824 BC)
– covered the hilly high plain dominated today bySidikan (also Sidekan; 36° 47
b N, 44° 40b E).
Fig. 17.05. Sketch map of the region round Sidekan (after Boehmer 1993-1997: 447).According to Shalmaneser I, the city was founded on bedrock, and Sargon II refers to its king Urzana as
a ‘mountain dweller’
. But while Musasir was protected by its mountainous location, once reached by anenemy army it could offer little resistance: among others, Shalmaneser I and Sargon II of Assyria and Rusa of
Urartu entered the city by force. Already an 18th century attestation for the city in a letter excavated in
Eidem & Læssøe 2001: 134-136 no. 63 ll. 20-21: a-na URU.Ar-ru-ni-im.KI la-wi-im
it-ta-al-ku ‘They have marched off to besiegeArrunum.’ Or should we emend the place name to URU.Ar-di
See for now Hassanzadeh 2006 (with map) who places the finds within the Mannean cultural horizon and Kargar & Binandeh 2009,who also see Rabat as Mannaean and do not accept the identification with Musasir.
Most prominently in the already mentioned Letter to Assur: Sg 8: 309-414; note also the Eponym Chronicle’s entry for 714 BC:
[a-na KUR.Ur-a]r-†i URU.Mu-Òa-Òir Hal-di-a ‘Against Urartu, Musasir and Haldi’ (Millard 1994: 47, 60).
Weidner 1926; cf. Mayer 1980: 21-22.66
The original (Room XIII, Slab 4) is mostly lost and we must rely on Eugène Flandin’s drawing (Botta 1849: pl. 141; Albenda 1986:
pl. 133) which is frequently reproduced, e.g. in this article as well as in Boehmer 1993-97: 449 Abb. 5, Salvini 1995: 95 Abb. 2, Lanfranchi
& Parpola 1990: II.
(modern Tell Shemshara), dating to the reign of Samsi-Addu of Ekall
atum, reported an alliance of Lullubian
kings marching against URU.Ar-ru-ni-im.KI in order to besiege the city:
this reference to a rich settlementin the foothills of the Zagros mountain range fits the profile of the later Musasir well.
What, then, about suggestions to look for Musasir outside of the Sidikan area, perhaps closer to Lake
Urmia? Only recently, the results of the excavations which have been conducted since 2005 under the direc-
tion of Bahman Kargar and Reza Heidari at Rabat Tepe, a settlement site some 15 km north-east of the town
of Sardasht (36° 09
b N, 45° 29b E) in the Iranian province of Western Azerbaijan, have given rise to the
hypothesis – voiced by Reza Heidari in various press releases – that the Iron Age remains encountered at this
site may be the ruins of Musasir; it is to be hoped that the finds, which include wall paintings and glazed
bricks, will soon be published
, especially the cuneiform inscriptions inscribed on various bricks. Until then,Heidari’s hypothesis must be treated with great caution; I personally am not inclined to consider Rabat Tepe
a likely candidate for identification with Musasir.
Fig. 17.06. The temple at Musasir: Eugène Flandin’s drawing of Slab 4 in Room XIII of Sargon’s palace at Dur-
(reproduced from Botta 1849: pl. 141).
Sargon famously plundered the sanctuary of Haldi and his consort Bagbartu in 714, an act celebrated both
in his official statements
and in the architectural decoration of the most prominent Assyrian buildings: thefacade of the A
ssur temple was covered with glazed bricks that illustrated Sargon’s Eighth Campaign
and thesame subject was chosen for the stone reliefs displayed on the walls of his palace at Khorsabad (Fig. 17.06)
Boehmer 1993-1997: 448-449.68
The contents of the temple according to Sargon’s list of booty are discussed by Mayer 1979.
König 1955-1957: 51-56 HchI 10 (= CTU A 3-1); see Belli 1999a.70
Belli 1999a: 37-41; for an improved drawing of the scene, with corrections to the depiction of Haldi, see Seidl 2004: 85 Abb. 48. See
also Roaf this volume Chapter 24: Figs. 24.16, 19-21. Zimansky (this volume 07: n.10) suggests that because he does not wear a divine
horned headdress instead of Haldi this figure represents the king endowed with the powers of Haldi.
Salvini 1994: 205.72
Petrosyan 2006: 230-231.
Possibly as the divine name misebaka (Hallock 1969: 19 and 732, but this is contested by Henkelmann 2008: 554) and more probably
as a theophoric element (written missa or mitra) in personal names (Hallock 731-733). According to Schmitt (2001: 750) the name of a ruler
in western Iran in 737 BC, Metraku, ‘doubtless represents’ a hypocoristic based on the theonym Mithra: this is, however, not certain (refer-
ences from M. Roaf).
Petrosyan 2006; important is the Armenian epic of the hero Mher which is closely connected with the Mithra legend and illustrates thestrength of local traditions.
Solecki 1998; see also the map in Solecki 1971: 26.76
Zimansky 1985: 5; Salvini 1993-1997: 445.
– the illustration of Haldi’s shrine, with its unique roof construction and its facade decorated with shields,
spears and statues, is perhaps the most celebrated architectural representation in Assyrian art; only the recov-
ery of the ruins of the building itself will be able to clarify how the Assyrian depiction is to be interpreted but
while the reconstruction as a prototype of a Classical Greek temple is extremely unlikely we may perhaps
imagine the building with a square ground plan and a pilaster facade, over which a tent roof was erected.
Any archaeologist working in the northern Zagros area would of course wish to discover Musasir, thehome of the legendary temple of the god Haldi, recipient of dedicatory gifts from Urartu, Assyria, Habhu and
even far-away Tabal.
Since the reign of Ispuini, Haldi headed the Urartian state pantheon despite the fact that
Musasir did not constitute part of the kingdom of Urartu but remained a separate state; from that time onwards,
a series of Haldi temples was built in Urartu, and in a store room of one of them, the shrine at the Upper Anzaf
fortress, a shield was excavated in 1995 that shows the deity leading the other Urartian gods into battle, in the
same sequence as in I
spuini and Minua’s inscription of Meher Kapısı.
The shield, dedicated by Ispuini and
Minua, shows Haldi as a warrior with a bow and a javelin (or perhaps a gigantic arrow?) and surrounded by
an aura of flames which calls to mind the blazing sun.
This first known depiction of the god would seem tostrengthen the view that there is a conceptual link between Haldi and Mithra, a connection assumed by the
traditional Armenian designation for the blind rock portal at Van, which the Urartians called ‘Door of Haldi’
, as Mheri dur ‘Door of Mher (Mithra), of which the more common name Meher Kapısı is but a translation into
Turkish. This association may already have been established in the Achaemenid period when Urartian tradi-
tions played an important role in the shaping of royal ideology; Mithra appears from the reign of Artaxerxes II
(404-359 BC) onwards in royal inscriptions
and perhaps before that in the Persepolis Fortification Tablets.73
has recently analysed the striking similarities between the two deities and argued, convinc-
ingly in my view, that they are part of the same stream of tradition. Indeed, Haldi’s depiction as a soldier and
solar deity corresponds closely to Mithras’ representation as known especially from Roman sources, the cult
of the Invincible Sun (Sol invictus) spreading across the empire from the first century AD with the Roman
army whose members encountered the mystery cult in the east. If we bear in mind that Musasir housed the
original Haldi temple, then two facts become highly significant, that the cult of Mithras is closely connected
to underground caves and that the raven is a key symbol of the god: first, a number of caves
in the Baradostmountains, holy Mount Andaruttu – among them the Shanidar cave, with its millennia long history of human
(and Neanderthal) occupation and ritual use – is situated in Musasir’s territory and secondly, Musasir is called
the ‘city of the raven’ in the already mentioned inscription of Urzana’s seal.
To return to the special connection between Haldi, the city of Musasir and the Urartian royal dynasty,
the crown prince of Urartu was appointed or at least confirmed as the future king under Haldi’s auspices inMusasir, and they and their top officials routinely visited the Haldi temple, apparently following a certain
schedule. If we bear in mind that it was known to the Urartians as ‘The City’, we may be tempted to describe
Musasir as the Holy City of the Urartians, and especially their kings. Is a comparison with Rome’s role for the
emperors of the Holy Roman Empire too far-fetched? Musasir’s special role for Urartian kingship was obvious
Sg 8: 411-413, see Kravitz 2003: 84, 88, 90-91.
Kravitz 2003: 93.79
Schwemer 2001: 456-458.
Hoffner 1998: 55-65.81
Schwemer 2001: 302 n. 2224 (with previous literature).
As advocated by Astour 1987: 28.83
Wilhelm 1994: 318: Kumme = verbal root kum- (denoting a building activity) + suffix -me (used to nominalise verbal roots).
Postgate 1973b: 58-59.85
The route is described in two letters from
Susarra (Eidem & Læssøe 2001: 70-74 no. 1 and 2), in one using the designation ‘road to
Kumme’ and in the other the itinerary Za-as-li.KI –Se-gi-ib-bu.KI – Zi-kum.KI – Ú-ra-ú.KI – Lu-ut-pí-is.KI ending in mat Haburatim (with
instructions to to go before the mountains and roads become snowbound), while the subsequent mention of a Gutian general and a man from
Kumme who receive wine rations according to a document from Tell Rimah (Dalley et al. 1976: no. 260) has prompted Mayer (2002: 331)
to assume that the Kummean acted as a guide and intermediary on behalf of the delegation from the eastern mountains.
also to the Assyrians, and this is utilised in the narrative of the capture of the city by Sargon, as presented to
ssur and the Assyrian public: after the lengthy enumeration of the spoils taken from temple and palace, thenarrative suddenly jumps to the reaction of Rusa of Urartu who collapses in despair over the news, tearing his
crown from his head in the process.
Kathryn F. Kravitz has described this very appropriately as ‘Rusa’s sym-bolic de-coronation’, implying that ‘Rusa’s kingship was essentially disabled by Sargon’s Eighth Campaign’
– in reality, Rusa was out of Assyrian reach when he learned of the sack of Musasir and the description given
of his reaction in the Letter to A
ssur is rather more likely to reflect wishful thinking than the report of an eye
witness in Assyrian service. But still, the fact that Musasir’s capture and the desecration of Haldi’s temple
could be envisaged as a crippling blow not just against the kingdom and its inhabitants but also, and espe-
cially, against Assyria’s arch-enemy speaks clearly of its importance as Urartu’s ritual focal point. Yet we
must bear in mind that this ‘holy city’, to use the words of Shalmaneser I, is already attested as a transregional
centre of considerable cultural influence centuries before the dynasty founded by I
spuini in the late 9th century
BC took control of Urartu.
But Musasir is not the only ancient cult centre and independent kingdom situated on the border region
between Assyria and Urartu; let us now turn to Kumme, home of the storm god.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
©2018 Учебные документы
Рады что Вы стали частью нашего образовательного сообщества.